Re: Taking ownership of gtkterm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Thomas píše v Po 03. 04. 2006 v 14:14 -0700:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > 
> > Its already build for FC-4, but assume you mean build the latest
> > version. Thats not exactly my habbit (I need to think about howto handle
> > this* one of these days). But I've synced FC-4 with 5 and devel and
> > requested a build for you :)

Thanks.

> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Hans
> > 
> > * This = When doing (minor?) updates to a newer FE-release and/or devel
> >   do I also push this for older FE releases. I believe this is what most
> >   others do maybe we need to make this policy for minor updates.
> 
> IMO, it's up to the maintainer whether they want to push updates to
> older releases.  Ideally these updates would be validated on the older
> releases before being pushed, and not all maintainers have the resources
> to test on all releases and architectures.  If the maintainer can find
> someone with access to the other releases/architectures who is willing
> to validate an update then that will make the job easier.
> 

So we can create some kind of build requests in bugzilla, where can be
written "I have built succesfully package foo from devel srpm, please
rebuild also for FC-x." And the maintainer can accept it and
update/build the package for FC-x or close it with WONTFIX.


		Dan


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux