Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpcdec: Musepack audio decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186909 bugs.michael@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |bugs.michael@xxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2006-04-01 10:13 EST ------- Licence is not LGPL, but BSD (aka "New BSD" or "Modified BSD"): http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php Else: APPROVED I've contacted upstream to seek for clarification with regard to the use of the term "patentless code". The not-so-short response confirmed my initial assumptions. The current code means to be "free of patents" in a similar way like Ogg Vorbis (rpm -qi libvorbis). That statement on the web page is quite unfortunate, as it mixed past and present and thereby raises doubts for anybody who is not intimately familiar with the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
