Re: What's worse: unowned directories or multiple owners?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 28 mars 2006 à 11:43 -0600, Rex Dieter a écrit :
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Maybe the third time is the charm:
> > 
> > I want to install a file into /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ but I don't 
> > want to Requires: /usr/share/emacs/site-list/.  Do I own 
> > /usr/share/emacs... in my package or do I leave open the possibility 
> > that the dir is unowned if emacs in not installed?
> 
> IMO, they're equally minor esthetic evils that can be lived with either way.

There's one I hate more (unowned directories) but in the end do as your
package reviewer asks you to and you'll be fine

The reviewer is always right. You can tweak you package once it's in the
repo if it eats at you too much.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux