Am Donnerstag, den 23.03.2006, 21:31 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Katz: > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:10 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.03.2006, 17:39 +0100 schrieb > > Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx: > > > ville.skytta@xxxxxx said: > > > > > notting at redhat dot com aqhbci-qt-tools > > > > Obsoleted by the FC aqbanking package. > > > Ok. I put it in Extras/PackagesNoLongerInDevel > > > > Okay, that works for now, but we need a real solution. Otherwise we'll > > create branches for this and similar packages forever and Extras CVS > > will be a real mess because of this old entry that are useless. > > > > @CVS-Admins: Would it be okay to remove the devel branch for packages > > like this? > > Per the discussion during the meeting this afternoon (and this has > probably been followed up, but mail is being slow) I send this mail shortly *before* the FESCo Meeting ;-) /me really hopes the e-mail problem will be solved soon. > I'd rather not remove the devel branches as we could potentially lose > history that way, especially if we ever have to bring a package back. I suspected something like that but didn't know the details yesterday. > I'd rather go with creating a file, eg, dead.package in the devel branch > and hopefully have it filled with the justification for _why_ it's no > longer needed. Then, we can use that file to key that it's a devel > branch which shouldn't need branching for new releases And that's the way it will be done. We already agreed on this in the meeting (Summary will follow). CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
