Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 ------- Additional Comments From fcron@xxxxxxx 2006-03-23 13:01 EST ------- > > I'm not sure I understand you ... do you mean "why a non priviledged user > > could not send a signal to fcron daemon?" > > In this case, you should know that a user can only send a signal to one of its > > processes. This implies that fcronsighup has to be root (or have root rights) > > to send a signal to fcron daemon which is run by root. > > I understand perfectly the issue, what I was saying is that the only > unpriviledged user that should be allowed to send this signal to fcron should be > the fcron user. > > What about having fcronsighup with the following rights: > -rwsr-x--- root fcron > or > -rwsr-xr-- root fcron > In fact the default rights of fcronsighup are: ---s--x--- 1 root fcron 14K 2006-03-01 14:49 /usr/bin/fcronsighup which mean that fcronsighup is not executable by anyone. Then you can sure add the read right. > > fcron runs the job with the user rights of the owner of the job. It has to be > > root to be able to change its rights to user's ones. > > Ok, so if the user wants only to run his jobs, then he can run it, so it should > be executable by anyone. > This is more complicated than that. Fcron can be used without root privileges, but then you have to compile it specifically for that. It just won't work if you simply give everyone the right to execute fcron. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
