Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx, | |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-03-22 10:04 EST ------- John (Mahowald) I'm a teacher in electronics and as such I'm interested in circuit software too. Also I've got a student who is currently using a self-compiled version of geda on top of FC-5. He has tested Wojciech Kazubski's SRPMS and they work (as good as the original, which has a few bugs). I can't sponsor either, but I have "acquired" the support of a sponser: Paul Howarth (added to CC-list). My agreement with Paul is that I'll do the full review and that he will look over my shoulder and do the sponsoring when he is happy with my review and Wojciech Kazubski's work. As such I would like todo a full review soon, starthing with this package and then chewing my way through the other geda packages. Questions: Can you do a full review soon, are shall I take over and do it? Maybe we can share the review load there are a lot of packages that together make up geda? About comment 6: I tend to agree however interesting in this light is are bug 185215 and bug 185501, where to reverse is being advocated (use "zlib License" instead of BSD) I think we need some kinda policy on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
