Gérard Milmeister wrote: > I noticed that that sbcl binary was installed with the execstack > bit on, while ecl and gcl had execstack off. Sbcl worked with > both selinux enabled and disabled, gcl and ecl only with selinux > disabled. If I switch the execstack bit on, both work as expected. > This seems to be an extension of selinux compared to FC4... > But how does it happen that sbcl has the execstack bit on? Rex? Dunno, nothing special packaging-wise that I'm aware of... guess I'll have to take a closer look at the source code (but nothing jumps out at me after a quick once-over). -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
