On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 20:30 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 14:09 -0500 schrieb seth vidal: > > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 20:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 10:36 -0500 schrieb > > > buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > > > > > > > liboil-0.3.7.1-1.fc5 > > > > > > We just broke the "Extras packages should not obsolete or update > > > packages from Core" rule. liboil is in FC5, it never should have been > > > build or pushed for FE5. > > > > > > Well, bad things happen. How to proceed? How to make sure something like > > > this does not happen again? > > > > > > > is it possible someone put it in core for fc5 and didn't check if it was > > already in extras? > > No, it an older version of the extras package that was moved to Core ;-) > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/liboil/liboil.spec?rev=1.5&view=markup > which means that the core maintainer is at a fault for not notifying the extras maintainer it was moved. looks like the culprit is Warren. -sv -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
