Update:
I've asked my student to look at this and the packages work as
advertised, there is a bug left and right, but thats more of an upstream
case, his own manually compiled version has exact the same symptoms.
When I find the time I'll start reviewing all the geda parts (why so many?).
Regards,
Hans
Paul Howarth wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
I'm an electronics teacher and one of my students is currently using
a locally compiled version of geda on FC5 this seems to work well as
suich I would like to see geda packaged. There already is a review
request for geda, but the packager needs a sponsor. I'm willing todo
a review, but I can't sponsor any sponsers who are willing to watch
over my back and do the actual approving?
I'll help. I've a background in electronics but I'm not a geda user.
Thanks
Is your student using the packages that up for review?
Nope he is using a localy compiled version I'll try to see if he is
willing to switch to them and I'll start a review of them.
That would be very useful, a good way of checking that the packages work
as intended and demonstrating that the packager is worthy of sponsorship
:-)
Shall I add you to the CC when I start the review?
Yes please.
Paul.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
