On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 17:36 +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: > bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx [really paul@xxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > > I would suggest the following: > > > > Instead of: > > - MUST: A package must not contain any BuildRequires that are listed in the > > exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > > - MUST: All other Build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. > > > > I'd have: > > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > > that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of > > those as BuildRequires is optional. > > I'd wholeheartedly agree with this (I've been looking at some packages > that I'm considering submitting and finding the removal of BR's just > because they happen to be in the current list of "standard" ones a bit > hard to swallow, especially when I might ideally like to use those in > other environments where the encoding of some BR's that are in the > Fedora "standard" list would be helpful) My +1 to the "I'd have" wording above. Others, spot? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
