Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seamonkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179802 ------- Additional Comments From kengert@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-17 19:59 EST ------- We decided to use MPL as the license tag, because that's the only license that covers everything. The license tag is the only difference to the previous spec file. http://kuix.de/mozilla/seamonkey/1.0-8/src/seamonkey.spec http://kuix.de/mozilla/seamonkey/1.0-8/src/seamonkey-1.0-8.src.rpm Chris, is this version acceptable for the initial seamonkey package release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
