Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gjots2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185498 ------- Additional Comments From toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-17 12:27 EST ------- >> E: gjots2 no-binary >> E: gjots2 only-non-binary-in-usr-lib >> >> does it apply on python? > Yes. Usually these would go under %{python_sitelib}, which rpmlint wouldn't > complain about. Alternately, they could go into %{_datadir}/%{name}. The usual criteria is whether the files are going to be used as a module within other programs or are just pieces of the base application that aren't going to be useful as library files. (Or whatever upstream prefers :-) python-docutils and gourmet are examples of something that installs to %{python_sitelib}. rpmlint and qa-assistant are examples of installing to %{_datadir}/%{name}. You might consider downloading and taking a look at the source rpms for some of those packages for examples of how they do things. There are several things in your spec that need to be changed and looking at those specs will help. (One thing that jumps out is that the package only includes .py files. You need to compile the files and include the .pyc files. .pyo files need to either be included or %ghosted as well.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
