-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:24:15 -0500, you wrote: >I'm trying to review Eterm: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 > >and am uncertain whether the various licenses within the source code >are, as a whole, acceptable. They appear to conflict and the upstream >maintainer (and main author) has not been very helpful regarding license On debian I have found a license file at http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/eterm/eterm_0.9.2-8/eterm.copyright and debian contains the package in the main repository. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2424) iQA/AwUBRBm/EU9gByurcX4MEQIO1gCg01Yjpysje7AQXVN3uMShCqPNdJUAmwQH uWdGok7fxwidoVwQJUwhRYv+ =YHm9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
