Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:24:21 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
So, I'm of the opinion that
unless a concrete example of broken-ness (ie, an app that doesn't work
after removing *only %_libdir/lib*.la), then I'd say don't worry about it.
It needs run-time evaluation to test whether any loaded modules are not
broken by that. I believe FC KDE contains the .la->.so fix, so the only
hope is that no other implemenation evaluates more of what's stored within
.la files.
I'd say that's a problem that should be targeted at fixing, instead of
having to workaround any theoretical/possible problem by (IMO, insanely)
taking the "all or nothing" stance on .la files.
-- Rex
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
