Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-03-15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, den 15.03.2006, 12:53 +0100 schrieb
Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx:
> pertusus@xxxxxxx said:
> > I don't think it is worth it, especially since Christian script catch the
> > issue (well, if I'm not wrong).
> Yup, the script is designed to catch those...

Yeah, and it does the job well. But I have a small problem with it:
Nearly nobody fixes the things where the script detects that they need
fixing. Some things were fixed during the mass-rebuild (e.g. packages
without a maintainer listed in owners.list, packagers where the
maintainer left Fedora Extras but did not tell us about it, ...).

We probably need a small QA sig/group/task-force that pokes maintainers
and creates bugs for those things that need fixing... Anyone interested
to drive this forward?

Cu
thl

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux