Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-14 10:59 EST ------- A few comments after a cursory look: - I can't find any evidence of license terms under which this package can be distributed, which would be a blocker and in need of fixing upstream - Extras packages shouldn't have a buildreq on perl - latest changelog release tag doesn't match actual release tag - some of the tests fail but "make check" passes - why? - missing buildreqs elfutils-libelf-devel and bzip2-devel - using find/filelist method for %files results in unowned directory %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/RPM2 - consider adding %{?dist} tag if this package is likely to be needed for future Fedora releases -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
