Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From silke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-14 09:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > - Drop static libs and .la files everywhere > - Consider including pymod/samples in -python %doc OK. I have changed this. Furthermore I have recompiled gdal fro FC 5. The new specfile and SRPMS are available at http://ftp.intevation.de/freegis/fedora/5 The output of rpmlint is: W: gdal unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgdal.so.1.9.0 W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdal_contour W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdaltindex W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdal_translate W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogr2ogr W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogrtindex W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdaladdo W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdalwarp W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ogrinfo W: gdal-bin unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gdalinfo Should I strip the binaries and libraries manually or can I ignore these warnings? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
