Jamie Zawinski and I are a bit in a row about whether distributing rss-glx in a fashion that its hacks can be directly used from xscreensaver is OK, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 (Hint: please review ;-) Jamie says that the licenses of xscreensaver (BSD with ad-clause) and rss-glx (GPL) are incompatible (which they are) and therefore distribution of rss-glx with xscreensaver in a way which lets the user directly use rss-glx hacks from xscreensaver would be illegal (which I doubt). I'd appreciate comments, especially if we should bother Legal about it. Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
