On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 12:13 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Paul W. Frields (stickster@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > I think a Documentation group would be a big help for FDP as we prepare > > to submit some of our build tools and actual documents to Extras for > > review and inclusion. Thanks for the opportunity! > > There's an already existing 'Authoring and Publishing' group that might > be useful for the build tools; the description is: > "These tools allow you to create documentation in the DocBook format > and convert them to HTML, PDF, Postscript, and text." No objection here to separating these/ > Documentation itself could very well be in a separate group. I suppose > the question is where does documentation go? Top level? Base System? > > Note that new top-level groups won't have icons for any new groups under > them without changes to the comps-extras package in Core. Base System seems like the right place to me, judging by the current content. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
