"illegal instruction" is a compiler bug, right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just got a report from a user of the Octave RPM on FC4 that he got a crash due to an illegal instruction on an old AMD K6-3. I was able to duplicate this on a Pentium 233 (yes, I still have one), but not on my Centrino laptop. This shouldn't happen, right? The configure command from the spec file is:

CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE" ./configure \
       --enable-shared=yes --enable-lite-kernel --enable-static=no \
       --prefix=%{_prefix} --infodir=%{_infodir} --libdir=%{_libdir}

This should produce something that runs on an i386, right? I just wanted to verify before I create g++ bug in bugzilla.

-Quentin

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux