Re: Specifying particular GPL versions in license tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JM" == Jose' Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> writes:

JM> I have asked the same question yesterday in the packagers
JM> mailing list:
JM> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-March/thread.html

Crap, another mailing list.  I belong to 136 mailing lists at last
count; might as well make that #137.

JM> As discussed in that thread I will apply those changes to the R
JM> modules that I have submitted. The consensus was that we shoult
JM> stick to GPL and ship the DESCRIPTION file in %doc.

Seems reasonable.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux