Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-wavethresh - R package for wavelets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183927 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-07 18:49 EST ------- This fares a bit better than R-waveslim. rpmlint says: W: R-wavethresh invalid-license GPL version 2 or later W: R-wavethresh no-documentation Good: We have no standards for R package naming, but R-packagename is reasonable. The specfile is clean and understandable. The source matches upstream. Package dependencies are sane. Package builds in mock. rpmlint finds no documentation, but all supplied documentation is part of R's internal help system, so this isn't a blocker. Bad: rpmlint doesn't like the License: tag. I have asked on the extras list whether it is acceptable or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
