Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 gemi@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fed|http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fed |ora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-|ora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml- |2.01-3.src.rpm |2.01-5.src.rpm ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-06 18:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The CAML light part of the license says "The user undertakes not to carry out > any paying distribution of the software." while allowing for cost of > reproduction. Don't know if this non commercial clause is too restrictive. It seems that CAML light has been relicensed to QPL and LGPL: http://caml.inria.fr/caml-light/license.en.html Would that solve the licensing problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
