[Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438





------- Additional Comments From rvinyard@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-03-06 02:03 EST -------
How embarrassing to have such a simple error in the example code labelled
'simple'; and that after the state that configure.in was in. At least on this
one I can claim that GCC-4.0 passed it, even though good style would have
demanded that it never be there.

Ralf, I never intended for you to end up a code reviewer, but I sincerely
appreciate the items you've pointed out.

Anyway, I've pushed a new release with the fixed example code. I've made a few
changes to the spec (replacing ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} with %{buildroot}, make with
%{__make}, and rm with %{__rm}). 

I've double and triple checked it to ensure that I didn't introduce any new
errors to ensure that this is the last time you have to look at this package.

Thanks again, and hopefully for the last time, here are the files:

Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec

SRPM Name or Url:
http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/4/srpms/idioskopos-0.1.10-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux