Re: Orpahns? (Re: Rebuild status)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I got two private replies:

Am Samstag, den 04.03.2006, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Am Samstag, den 04.03.2006, 13:45 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> > latest rebuild status: 181 Packages still need a rebuild. [...]
> 
> I looked a bit closer at some of the other packagers that didn't rebuild
> a single package in the past weeks. I suspect that the packages listed
> below might be orphaned; their packages will get a copy of this mail
> directly. Guys, are you still around? 
> 
> Maybe they show up. I think if they don't do until Thursday we'll orphan
> those packages officially and remove them from the devel-repo if
> possible (e.g. no other packages depend on them).
>[...]
> > mihai_AT_xcyb.org                           htb-util                            0.2.4-0.4.pre1
> There was never a commit from him in Fedora Extras afaics. Anyone
> interested in taking this one over?

He's still around, but unfortunately has not enough time to dedicate
to the Fedora community anymore. He agreed to orphan it.

> > tripwire-devel_AT_genesis-x.nildram.co.uk   tripwire                            2.3.1-22
> There was never a commit from him in Fedora Extras afaics. Anyone
> interested in taking this one over?

Still around, too. "Here are the reasons Tripwire has stagnated:[...]
Tripwire will not compile on gcc4.1[...] I suggest that you pass the
maintainer flag onto somebody else". I'll forward the complete mail with
all the details to Brandon or anybody else interested in this package.

CU
th.
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux