Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer08-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183694 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2006-03-04 17:42 EST ------- Both work with gst-launch-0.10, and they are examples from the manual page. I recall there have been similar/same problems with GStreamer/ALSA before. Suggest an alternative test on how to verify whether this GStreamer works. What applications need this version of GStreamer? This different one works: gst-launch-0.8 filesrc location=test.wav ! typefind ! spider ! audioconvert ! audioscale ! volume ! alsasink gst-launch-0.8 filesrc location=test.wav ! typefind ! spider ! audioconvert ! audioscale ! volume ! alsasink device=hw:0 $ gconftool-2 -g /system/gstreamer/0.8/default/audiosink alsasink [...] Anyway, I have a few issues with this package: * Source tarball has not been stripped off of code with legal issues. The "removed-sources.txt" for 0.8.11 is included, but the source tarball has been upgraded to 0.8.12. [BLOCKER] * GConf2 scriptlets are incomplete. * Requiring /usr/bin/gconftool-2, but running "gconftool-2" is unclean. Require exactly what you run. If you run "gconftool-2" from $PATH, don't require an absolute path. * Inter-package deps are wrong: references to gstreamer-devel [BLOCKER] * Explicit "Requires: cdparanoia-libs >= alpha9.7" and "Requires: libmusicbrainz >= 2.1.1" are not needed, since the automatic soname dependencies are present and the minimum versions of those packages are available in FC5. * GStreamer libdir is included in main package already. * The two executables in this package are Perl scripts and create an ugly dependency on Perl. Not a blocker, but not nice. Considering that this is just sort of a compatibility package, do we need them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
