On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:15 -0800, Wart wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hans de Goede wrote: > > Also I'm interested in the Games SIG, I could add myself as a member to > > the page but that doesn't do much really. Wouldn't it be an idea to > > create a list for the games Sig (and maybe other active sigs too). > > Until now, email traffic related to the Games SIG has been very low, > which didn't make a separate mailing list feel necessary. Using > [games-sig] in the subject line seems like a good interim solution. > > But maybe we're reaching a critical mass now that would warrant such a > list. My only concern would be that any packaging related issues should > also be seen by the greater FE devel community. I don't want the Games > SIG to become an isolated group with respect to packaging discussions. ATM I think a wiki-based model would be nicer than a list as most of the trafic has been packaging related. If the discussion starts to formulate around spinning a Fedora-Games distribution/addon CD, it may be time to consider a separate ML. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
