Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 11:48 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 05:12 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >>You can document <foo> in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/<foo>. [...] > >Wouldn't > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packages/<foo> > >or > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Packages/<foo> > >(I would prefer the former) > >be a better place? Just my 2 cent. > I dont think so. It just makes access harder Just a little bit harder. I don't think this is a problem. Especially for Extras contributors that are the target for this. > for those who are new to > the wiki. Just create a new category "CategoryPackages" and make every > such page at the root level in this category for keeping track of them. Well, the reason why I prefer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packages/ or something similar is this: I can mass-subscribe in the wiki to Packages/.* or Extras/.* and get a copy of everything that happens in that area. I can't subscribe to categories afaik :-| Well, I can subscribe to ".*", but then I can a lot of things that are no of interest for me, e.g. translations, personal homepages,... And we have separate namespaces in the wiki already for Docs/, Extras/, Packaging/, Ambassadors/, Infrastructure/, Legacy/, Marketing/ and Core/ (some of them don't use them yet completely, but most are). Why break this nice organization? CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
