Re: Ruby specfile template issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:29 +0100, Oliver Andrich wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:54:00AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "MS" == Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > MS> It does work in mock, albeit only when building the binary, not
> > MS> when preparing the src.rpm in host chroot.
> > 
> > Mock errors out before it even gets to the point of building the
> > binary (unless you stick the "|| echo ruby" hack onto the end).  That
> > was what prompted me to start this thread originally.
> 
> Well, I think I should have a look at mock, cause if all these errors
> are the case, then there must be something wrong there. 

No, not really. mock doesn't have ruby installed when it goes to resolve
the deps (including ruby, of course), so the spec file when fully
evaluated ends up being invalid.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux