On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:28:53AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I couldn't find any of the valid licenses in rpmlint which matches the > Ruby license. These days everything in Ruby is dual Ruby/GPL; it it > acceptable to use just GPL or should "Ruby license" be added to > rpmlint's list? (If so, I'll file a bug.) > > Note that the OSI doesn't list Ruby's license, but Debian accepts it > as free: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ And it is even GPL compatible, so I also think it would be a good thing to update rpmlint. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html Best regards, Oliver -- Oliver Andrich --- oliver.andrich@xxxxxxxxx --- http://roughbook.de/ -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
