Looks to me like the sensible thing to do is to modify rpmlint. --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I couldn't find any of the valid licenses in rpmlint which matches the > Ruby license. These days everything in Ruby is dual Ruby/GPL; it it > acceptable to use just GPL or should "Ruby license" be added to > rpmlint's list? (If so, I'll file a bug.) > > Note that the OSI doesn't list Ruby's license, but Debian accepts it > as free: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ > > The license text is at http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt > > - J< > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
