On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 19:39 +0100, dragoran wrote: > openal-0.0.9-0.3.20060226 100% |=========================| 8.1 kB 00:00 > ---> Package openal.x86_64 0:0.0.9-0.3.20060226cvs.fc4 set to be updated > --> Running transaction check > --> Processing Dependency: libopenal.so.0()(64bit) for package: blender > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: libopenal.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package > blender > seems like blender needs a rebuild.. Nope, openal will revert to the previous soname in 0.0.9-0.4.* > should I fill a bug? Already reported and also discussed on this list. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/181989 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
