Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Wart wrote: > >> While I was packaging angband, I came across this questionable license >> text. Before I spend too much time with this, I wanted to verify that >> the first paragraph is valid. In particular, it says that the software >> can be copied and distributed for non-for-profit purposes, that is, not >> for commercial purposes. Does this disqualify it as an OSI-compatible >> license? >> >> >> > Yes it does. It is not a OSI compatible since the OSI definition, claus > 6 disallows a OSI license to discriminate against fields of endeavor. > Refer to http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php for more details. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to get it into livna instead. --Wart
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
