Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-27 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Aha! So when something is in the GNU standard but not the FHS, > which one should win in the Fedora world...? None. Both standards cover different aspects. The GNU standards aim at configuration portability, the FHS is the smallest common denominator that many *nix vendors (almost) agree to. So, in this case it's a matter of "switching on brains" and "taking the plunge" of drawing responsible decisions. As far as, sharedstatedir is concerned, this is rarely used, because it's beyond the scope of most packages, and beyond the reponsibility of vendors ("shared statedir", architecture independent data, it is supposed to be shared between different architectures and OSes). Implementing it definitely is a very tough task, and therefore probably not covered by the FHS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
