Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyfugue: A MU* client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179541 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk@xxxxxxxxxx |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-25 18:55 EST ------- You may have seen older fedora.us guidlines. Good: - rpmlint checks clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. I have since become a sponsor, so send me your Fedora account info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
