Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180743 ------- Additional Comments From woodard@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-23 18:49 EST ------- OK fixed a bunch more things. Now all packages not just the src.rpm have almost all their warnings resolved: $ sudo rm -f /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pdsh-*;sudo cp /tmp/pdsh.spec .;sudo rpmbuild -ba pdsh.spec; rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pdsh-* | grep -v invalid-vendor | grep -v invalid-distribution | grep -v no-packager-tag| grep -v invalid-buildhost | grep -v no-signature <snip> W: pdsh-debuginfo non-standard-group Development/Debug W: pdsh-rcmd-rsh no-documentation W: pdsh-rcmd-ssh no-documentation The debuginfo package warning I think will be resolved by building in a different environment. rcmd-rsh and rcmp-ssh in fact do not have any documentation associated with them. Fixing that warning is an exercise for upstream. http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pdsh/pdsh-2.8.1-4.src.rpm http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pdsh/pdsh.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
