Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ser - Sip Express Router https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180345 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-16 16:23 EST ------- > About the different packages: > But about the jabber, cpl-c and pa modules, I'm not so sure. All they depend > on are libxml2, expat and pthread. I think that in any case it's a generally a good idea to split a package into a subpackages especialy if authors provide plugin-mechanism for their application. I personally prefer splitting to as many packages as could. Why break modularization and provide one big rpm? Actually, I think that the question must be "why not to split SER into subackages" rather than "why split...?" :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
