Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi - a new MPI implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173719 ------- Additional Comments From ed@xxxxxxx 2006-02-16 14:35 EST ------- Hi Jason, I think most of comment #21 is fine but I have one objection: *** PLEASE *** move the lam-supplied files [I'll refrain from using the word "crap" here :-)] currently in /usr/include/* to /usr/include/lam/* and from /usr/lib/* to /usr/lib/lam/*. Its something we really ought to do. In fact, if lam were submitted to Fedora Extras in its current shape it would not pass review for exactly these reasons. And yes, the above lam changes would require some *small* changes to the packages that depend upon it. Not a big deal. Whatever small pain it causes now, the benefits for end users and Extras packagers dwarf it. [And whoever decided it was a good idea to put files named "freq.h", "boot.h", "net.h", and "args.h" in /usr/include should be banished to rotating backup tapes in a cold machine room for the next month or two.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
