Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heartbeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180897 ------- Additional Comments From alanr@xxxxxxx 2006-02-16 05:32 EST ------- The reasons for having the pils package separate is that this is a general purpose library - usable without heartbeat. The same is true of the stonith libraries. Indeed, Red Hat has historically used these same packages in some of their products. We probably need to re-do some of these subpackages, but being compatible with how the project distributes them is also helpful. (i.e., if it's a mistake, at least it's a consistent mistake). The project distributes everything as RPMs, so having the RH RPMs consistent with the other RPMs we distribute has some value, IMHO... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
