[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monodoc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-02-16 02:12 EST -------
When I installed mono on my x86_64 boxes, everything defaulted to /usr/lib,
hense the warning.

There isn't a problem (as such) with 64 bit stuff going into /usr/lib. I was
under the impression though that anything 64 bit should really go in /usr/lib64
until such time that use of 64 bit was far more widespread.

I kind of assumed there was a problem with the 64 bit version between test2 and
some of the newer kernels due to the find file bug (or whatever it was called).
However, even on kernel 1948 there is a problem with compilation (try compiling
gtksourceview-sharp and you'll see what I mean (it complains that
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/../../share/gapi-2.0/gnome-api.xml doesn't exist when it
does - this could be down to a configure problem but the file does exist on my
machines).

Thanks for the comments

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux