Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-libertine-fonts - TrueType serif fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179439 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk@xxxxxxxxxx |kevin@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-16 00:41 EST ------- Greetings, heres a review: MUST items: OK - licence ok (GPL). OK - no rpmlint output OK - package name good. OK - spec file matches. OK - spec in english. OK - spec legible. OK - md5sum matches: be31789d2bcb0d01f1755491d28d72a3 LinLibertineSRC.tgz be31789d2bcb0d01f1755491d28d72a3 LinLibertineSRC.tgz.1 OK - compiles and builds under devel. OK - files and dirs ok. OK - clean section good. OK - macros good. OK - builds ok in mock on devel. As far as the name goes, that bug refered to in comment #7 says (in part): "For example Debian uses ttf-fontname for the package names. Fedora so far uses fontname-fonts. However, this is a very minor issue, which could go either way. Since it is not a policy it is up to you to decide the package name." It might be good to post to fedora-extras-list and ask for some thoughts on font package naming? That should be added to the wiki on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines once it's decided. Nice looking fonts BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
