[Bug 179904] Review Request: icecast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: icecast


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179904





------- Additional Comments From holbrookbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-02-15 23:56 EST -------
[[ This review is only for icecast.  ices will be considered later pending the
upgrade of libshout to 2.x ]]

I assume you know why you specified:
BuildRequires: automake16
...but it's not obvious

Now onto the checklist...

rpmlint's only complaint:
W: icecast strange-permission icecast.init 0755

But init scripts need to be executable, so rpmlint is retarded

naming guidelines: OK
name matches base package: OK
specfile matches base package: OK
packaging guidelines: OK
GPL License: OK
COPYING file matches (and included in %doc): OK
legible: OK
md5: OK
  2d80a249fa8529f82d018c6216108ea8  SOURCES/icecast-2.3.1.tar.gz
  2d80a249fa8529f82d018c6216108ea8  icecast-2.3.1.tar.gz
successful build:
  i386=OK
  ppc=OK
  x64=UNKNOWN ( Nothing to try it on :-/ )
BuildRequires: OK
ownership/permissions: OK
no duplicate %files: OK
%clean: OK
consistent macros: OK

IMO, APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux