Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180102 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-12 18:30 EST ------- I think you gave the link to the wrong srpm there, but I found the proper one and gave a quick look. Are you sure that license is MIT? It seems to have an advertising clause that is not in the stock MIT license as found at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php, and indeed seems closer to the three clause BSD license (but I'm no expert). Here is the clause: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of the Software and its Copyright notices. In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be given that this software has been used if no source code of this software is made available publicly. This includes acknowledgments in either Copyright notices, Manuals, Publicity and Marketing documents or any documentation provided with any product containing this software. This License does not apply to any software that links to the libraries provided by this software (statically or dynamically), but only to the software provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
