Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heartbeat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180897 alanr@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alanr@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From alanr@xxxxxxx 2006-02-11 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > From a look at the configure.in it seems that it may use both old and new libnet > > api. So the best is to use the newer, by having > > > > Buildrequires: libnet-devel > > > > instead of libnet10. > > Done.. > > Spec Name or Url: > http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/heartbeat/heartbeat.spec > SRPM Name or Url: > http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/heartbeat/heartbeat-2.0.2-3.src.rpm > > - remove BuildRequire libnet10 > - add BuildRequire libnet-devel > > Builds fine in mock (FC4-i386). I think some parts use either API for historical reasons, but I believe the IPv6 code (which is newer) only uses the newer libnet API. Let me know if there's anything we should change in the project's packaging to make this easier for you. There are also lots of bug fixes and some nice new features (GUI, etc.) in 2.0.3 which just came out yesterday. Thanks! -- Alan Robertson alanr@xxxxxxx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
