On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:21 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > Still unsure (Comments please!): > > * what do we do with packages where no maintainer steps up to request > > builds? Jeremy suggest "and when we get to FC5 - 2 weeks or so, we can > > step in for things that haven't been touch if needed". Or do we remove > > them and consider them orphaned if we don't hear *anything* from the > > maintainers after a bug was opened and nothing happened for one or two > > weeks? > > * Packages not rebuild before the 12th of February will be removed > > before FC5 is shipped to start with a clean tree with old cruft > > removed. > > Should not this be "Packages not rebuild after 12th of February will be > removed"? Because you plan to start the rebuild on the 12th. Also, there are many noarch packages which don't benefit from a rebuild at all, so I think the above removal plan should be limited to non-noarch packages. The buildsys assigns (or at least did) all noarch builds to the ppc builder which is already a bottleneck and that is made even worse if we're doing dummy zero-gain noarch rebuilds at a time like this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/174685 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
