Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seamonkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179802 ------- Additional Comments From kengert@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-10 15:36 EST ------- > > Ok, done. Motivated by your proposal, I tried to > > use the same build code as used in the firefox spec file. > > But that failed, I got errors in install stage, > > What specific errors? During install, the RPM build system tries to access a path that does not match what is produced in /var/tmp As it requires so much time to build, I was not motivated to make further attempts, but decided to go with the code that works. > Does it work if you Require: seamonkey (it should be Require anyway, and > please one Require per line.) You mean RequireS: instead of Prereq: ? Trying. > > Or should we use some "find" statements to change the modes before they > > are copied? Or do you have a better idea? > > I think either solution is probably sufficient. I found the existing spec has # fix permissions of the chrome directories /usr/bin/find . -type d -perm 0700 -exec chmod 755 {} \; || : I will add # We don't want JS files to be executable /usr/bin/find . -type f -name \*.js -exec chmod 644 {} \; || : and see if that works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
