Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docbook2X - Convert docbook into man and Texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179916 jamatos@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos@xxxxxxxx 2006-02-09 14:57 EST ------- Preliminary review: Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source docbook2X-0.8.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Spec file is readable * License is correct * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of docbook2X looks OK it complains about the lib nature of one of its dependencies but in this case it is bogus. * Package follows packaging rules OK * File list of docbook2X looks OK One minor question, since the package searches tidy is there any reason not to BR it? Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
