Enrico Scholz wrote:
rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Rex Dieter) writes:
respectively, but the "GTK+ icon cache" section says (rightfully) "Note that no dependencies should be added for this".
Instead of, it should state that:
* 'Requires(post): gtk2' shall be added for packages shipping icons and requiring gtk2 (e.g. typical Gnome2 applications)
I disagree. This would be (mostly?) pointless. The pkgs in question already implicitly require gtk2 already, why add the bloat?
* a '%trigger -- gtk2' with gtk-update-icon-cache shall be added for packages shipping icons and NOT requiring gtk2 (e.g. KDE applications)
Ack, no. No need to add needless triggers, that could potentially get run 10's or theoretically 100's of times. There's a better way (see below)
Else, when you have a installation sequence of 1. package-A 2. gtk2 with package-A shipping icons, you will get a 5-10 startup penalty for every gtk2 application because the icon cache is outdated and 'gtk-update-icon-cache' was not executed.
That's why gtk2 should include it's own %post scriptlet: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/170335 -- REx -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
