On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 03:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 19:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/config.log > > Probably a broken configure script: > > The X11 check this configure script uses, checks for libXt (cf. > X11/Intrinsic.h) instead of libX. > > BR: libXt-devel > inside of the spec should be applicalbe to work around this issue. > > The actual fix would be to fix the configure script to not look for Xt > header (X11/Intrinsic.h) but for an X-header. > Thanks Ralf, Kevin, and Jeremy! I'm looking into whether the configure script needs to be using AC_PATH_XTRA or if AC_PATH_X is fine. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
