Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:33 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
Author: qspencer
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30627
Modified Files:
ginac.spec
Log Message:
Update URL and fix unpackaged files.
Index: ginac.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel/ginac.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- ginac.spec 31 Oct 2005 23:23:57 -0000 1.2
+++ ginac.spec 2 Feb 2006 16:33:55 -0000 1.3
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Group: System Environment/Libraries
License: GPL
URL: http://www.ginac.de/
-Source0: ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/GiNaC/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source0: http://www.ginac.de/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
@@ -86,24 +86,29 @@
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root)
+%doc %{_infodir}/*.info*
+%doc %{_mandir}/man?/ginac-config.1*
These %doc are redundant, please remove them.
Redundant how?
%{_libdir}/*.a
Why are you shipping static libs?
I don't know. I modeled my first spec files that included libraries
after others that were already in Extras, and have just done things that
way all along (including a few other packages I maintain), but this was
all before people started preaching the evils of static libs. I guess I
can remove them.
-Quentin
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
